Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travelocity
 | This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Ad and sub-stub. Travelocity doesn't need any help advertising their services. -- Mud 18:24, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Already passed VfD, a significant company for which we should have an article. File in cleanup. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 18:28, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- (not a vote) I added a bunch of stuff. It's certainly not a sub-stub now. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 18:09, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Agree that it's a sub-stub, but it is not an ad. Significant company. Keep in cleanup. Rossami 21:46, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Lousy article currently, but a significant company. If memory serves, Travelocity began well before either Expedia or Orbitz and may well have claims to being "the first" Internet travel site. Dpbsmith 23:00, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. I did try to scare up more information about the company to improve the article, but found their web site so annoying that I could not. - TB 09:04, Jun 24, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Significant company. Andris 00:53, Jun 25, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. I have so much less Wikipedia time now that I probably won't write it up, but there's some interesting background at hoovers.com, such as american airlines was among the founders of both it and one of its competitors (orbitz, if memory serves), which is a bit odd. Niteowlneils 03:11, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- KeeP. Spleeman 04:47, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. -- pne 05:14, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)