Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | Noticeboard for India-related topics was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 14 November 2011. |
| Noticeboard for India-related topics was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 26 December 2007. |
 | This page has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
| Article alerts for WikiProject India |
|
Did you know
Articles for deletion
Proposed deletions
Categories for discussion
Redirects for discussion
Files for discussion
Featured article candidates
Featured list candidates
Good article nominees
Good article reassessments
Requests for comments Peer reviews
Requested moves
Articles to be merged
Articles to be split
Articles for creation
|
| This table is updated daily by a bot |
| ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
The article Tihawali has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unreferenced and unimproved almost 15 years. No reliable sources online Google news, newspapers, books, or scholar. Run of the mill, very small village. Not enough information to merge. Can redirect if necessary.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 15:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Request for comments/help at WikiProj:Archaeology
[edit]Just asking for people interested in India-related topics for help or input at my discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Archaeology. Thanks. Tolozen (talk) 09:15, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Dal Lake has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:27, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Khandoba has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:37, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Criticism of the Pakistan Armed Forces
[edit]There is an active proposal to merge Criticism of the Pakistan Armed Forces into The Establishment (Pakistan). Please share your thoughts on this. Thanks. 109.204.231.244 (talk) 11:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Indian Institute of Management Rohtak
[edit]Indian Institute of Management Rohtak has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:42, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Ujjal Dosanjh
[edit]Ujjal Dosanjh has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:07, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Hello all! I'm in the process of making some pretty extensive edits to this article (mostly removing portfolio-esque content copied from LinkedIn), but need some additional sources for verification. My searches in English are turning up very few results. Any help getting this off the ground would be appreciated - thanks! jellyfish ✉ 23:47, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Moving Delhi, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Lakshwadeep, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu Administrative Service to Danics
[edit]Due to the excessively long name of this article, I think it should be moved back to DANICS (which is currently a redirect to Delhi, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Lakshadweep, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu Administrative Service to DANICS) due to it being the most common name used by sources. I put this topic here instead of the main article due to how little traction it gets. Sangsangaplaz (Talk to me! I'm willing to help) 14:24, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
The state of Indian media
[edit]A thought-provoking interview of Rajdeep Sardesai [1]. I remember him being cocky about it a year or two ago. Now he sounds completely despondent. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 19:14, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, about 9 to 10 years ago, Indian media became deprecated. Bearian (talk) 15:50, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Please see Wikipedia:ICTFSOURCES and User:Ms Sarah Welch/sandbox/Paid news and private treaties. Bearian (talk) 15:55, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Even on Wikipedia they are mostly unusable for establishing any form of notability, not to mention how most of them support the ruling party. - Ratnahastin (talk) 15:56, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- This month, Caravan profiled News18 and it cannot be nearer to truth. The amount of ludicrous junk they have pushed on Sambhal Mosque boggles my mind. Probably, nothing except The Indian Express, The Hindu, and The Dainik Bhaskar are worth relying upon anymore. Upd Edit (talk) 17:58, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- The freedom allowed for each media house has been circumscribed individually. Nobody is immune. Even we are not. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:32, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
The article Kalikave has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unreferenced and unimproved almost 15 years. No reliable sources. Run of the mill farm next to an open pit mine. Not enough information to merge.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 15:42, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Can someone please source this? I can’t find any information or references. Bearian (talk) 15:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Bearian seems it has some notability based on google news search. e.g. see this (uses "kanthalloor", but must be same as Kantallur). I can try to find better source(s). Asteramellus (talk) 15:57, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Bearian (talk) 15:58, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oh seems there is a page for Kantalloor so now not sure if this "Kantallur" is a different village. But will try to look. Asteramellus (talk) 16:05, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Bearian (talk) 15:58, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
The article Krishna Mandir, Barohiya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unreferenced and unimproved almost 15 years. No reliable sources online Google news, newspapers, books, or scholar. Not enough information to merge.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 16:17, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
This stub is a disaster. Please let’s fix it. Bearian (talk) 20:44, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
I was going to propose deleting it, but that was already rejected. The text and the title don’t match, but I’m unsure if it’s vandalized or an error. Can you please fix this? Bearian (talk) 01:30, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Seems there are many pages like this (e.g. see Bacharam) - maybe they are notable regionally (but I was not able to find many sources), and someone added them originally. Anumantharayan Kottai mentioned in the lead seems a different village! so must be a mistake. Also, seems city is spelled differently (Pithalaipatti) in google maps. And interestingly, google maps quick facts shows wiki's lead paragraph with the incorrect village name. Asteramellus (talk) 20:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Interesting! Can you fix it? Or send it to WP:AfD so we can start from scratch? Bearian (talk) 01:59, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
I’m proposing to merge a hamlet and a school into this small community. Bearian (talk) 01:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
The article Sita Marhi Natyashala has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unreferenced and unimproved 15 years. No sources online Google news, newspapers, books, or scholar. Not enough information to merge. Fails verification.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 05:03, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Please find sources. There is no Tamil language article. Bearian (talk) 21:11, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
The article Inai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unreferenced and unimproved almost 15 years. No relevant and reliable sources online Google news, newspapers, books, or scholar. Not named on Open Source map. Apparently very small village. Not enough information to merge. Willing to redirect.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 21:16, 10 December 2024 (UTC)