This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hertfordshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.HertfordshireWikipedia:WikiProject HertfordshireTemplate:WikiProject HertfordshireHertfordshire
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire
This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia
This edit removed all mention of the railway viaduct, between junctions 16 and 17, with the graffiti slogan "Give Peas A Chance". But it seems there are quite a few sources for the bridge and slogan, suggesting that it was or is notable. Should it be re-added? Martinevans123 (talk) 17:47, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"Given that it has received some wide media coverage [1][2][3][4][5][6] (two of which were cited in the article) and is discussed in a Historic Building Recording of the Chalfont Viaduct, I judge it to be noteworthy. Everybody knows about it, they just can't read about it on Wikipedia."
So I thought it might be worth asking other editors here. I tend to agree with him. You never know, he might just drop by and support re-inclusion. lol. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:55, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am not happy about the games section in this article. I trimmed it back to "The video game, M25 Racer, was produced by Davilex Games in 1997, simulating the racing phenomenon. A similar game, TOCA Race Driver 3 by Codemasters, was released in 2006." which I think we can agree is uncontroversial and not under dispute. I did not like the spong.com source added by 86.183.140.99 as it starts off with "When SPOnG hears about controversial stories concerning video games in the UK?s national press (read: Daily Mail or a sister paper) we immediately think of some heinous crime being linked to games with violent content being irresponsibly sold to minors. .... Well, this morning, London?s commuters were treated to a new video game controvo-shit-storm. But this time it?s all a bit different. And, thankfully, a lot less dark." That doesn't sound like a reliable source.
However, since my compromise was reverted, I am taking an alternative stance. I don't personally think anything associated with the Daily Mail has a place in a good article unless it's of vital importance and would compromise the article's neutrality if not included. Which this doesn't. If editors are arguing about whether something's true or not, if in doubt, leave it out. Ritchie333(talk)(cont)12:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am currently trying to clear the backlog in my main sandbox and I wish to ask if anyone would be interested in incorporating a detailed timeline to this article, or "Timeline of the M25 motorway"? Best, --Minoa (talk) 17:05, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article uses the SI-related 'tonne' as a unit of weight in various places. However, this is often converted via a template to 'short ton', which is a US unit. It would make more sense, if conversion is to be provided, to convert to 'long ton' (aka 'Imperial ton') which is the UK unit of weight, since the road is in the UK and not the USA.
Whilst sticking to international units, such as SI and SI-related units, might make good sense, if any conversion to another unit is to be used surely it should not be a US one, unless Wikipedia wishes to be a US-centric web site (as it often seems to). 86.184.212.55 (talk) 12:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]